The Challenges of the Monsoon Session of Parliament
by Bhavika Chandwani
Days were gone when the
operation of both chambers of Parliament was shaped by constructive discussions
and discussions on topics of national significance and public interest.
Disruptions, much to the
dismay of many, have now taken center stage and have become the rule rather
than the exception. The Parliament's monsoon session was a flop, with no
significant debates or discussions on a plethora of issues affecting the
country. This does not bode well for our parliamentary system.
On 11th August, the
monsoon session of Parliament concluded two days ahead of schedule, with both
the Lok Sabha and the Rajya Sabha adjourning sine die.
The session had started off on
a sour note in the light of the Pegasus snooping scandal, with opposition
members disrupting proceedings on a regular basis.
Members of the opposition
parties flocked to the well every day throughout the session, shouting
anti-government slogans and waving banners, demanding a discussion on the
Pegasus spying case and the repeal of three agricultural legislation.
The Lok Sabha was only in
session for 21 hours during the Monsoon Session, and its output was barely 22%.
There were 17 sittings in the lower house. The Rajya Sabha, on the other hand,
had a 28 percent productivity rate. In the upper house, 17 sittings lasted a
total of 28 hours and 21 minutes. Due to interruptions, up to 76 hours and 26
minutes were lost.
If the opposition is
responsible for causing chaos and slowing Parliamentary proceedings over the
Pegasus spyware problem, the BJP governing regime cannot claim high moral
ground and must accept responsibility for refusing to give the opposition any
room.
The fact that it rammed
through twenty crucial bills without even a smidgeon of debate during this
monsoon session lends weight to its claim to be more authoritative and
intolerant of opposition.
The BJP leadership's repeated
attempts to stonewall criticism and portray the whole opposition as a band of
disruptors, indicating its incapacity to govern the house, had also left a lot
to be desired.
Comments
Post a Comment